Thursday, March 27, 2008
BA #1 McCarthy's The Road
2. This secret is very much referring to the same secret that is revealed on page 52. We are told that "The clock stopped at 1:17. A long shear of light and then a series of low concussions." We presume that the Papa and the boy are wondering because of what has happened at this point in the book at 1:17. This could be a completely unrelated event or it could be the reason why the country is in chaos. We have no idea to know if these events are linked together more then just a events in the same book or if the event that happened at 1:17 is the reason for the boy and Papa to be walking.
3. Understanding weather or not that this boy is Papa's son and that Papa is the boys father is very cruicial to the book. I would help us better understand why the man is so protective of the boy. Though the boy never calls the man Papa and the Papa never calls the boy son it leaves us wondering if something is up between them being related or a father son relationship.
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
BA#1 McCarthy's The Road
This secret occurred between the young boy and his "Papa." Throughout the story, the boy had a pessimistic attitude toward the future. I suspect his secret is that he felt they had no hope of survival. His true feelings became apparent on page 55. The two were resting. The boy was woken up because of the severity of his father's cough. Papa told the boy "Its okay. Go to sleep." and the boy replied, "I wish I was with my mom." Further on, the author explains the death of the boy's mother. This validates my point that he had little will to go on. Meanwhile, his father was fighting for their survival.
II.
Both secrets are from McCarthy’s The Road. This time around, it is the father who has a secret from the boy. In the conversation held between Papa and his wife prior to her suicide, the woman mentions how if anything were to happen to Papa, that she and her son would be doomed. Even along side her family, the woman still felt hopeless. She told Papa on page 56 that, "I'd take him with me if it weren't for you" and soon thereafter, she committed suicide. Papa has never told his son that his mother wished to end both of their lives so as not to end up living in such disaster. Papa has not shared this secret with the boy and I predict he never will.
III.
I feel that the secret I chose is very significant in understanding the narrative. The boy seems very weak and hopeless and with characteristics such as these, it seems to me that Papa may be on his own soon. If Papa were to reveal his secret to the boy, the boy would probably attempt suicide himself. Thus far into the novel leads me to believe it to be one of two things: 1: a story of courage and the strength of family and love, or 2: one man's desperation for survival and his trials along the way.
BA#1 McCarthy's The Road
II: This first secret leads us to another secret of why only the boy, his mother, and Papa were among only the few to survive what happened. If we knew answers to either of these to secrets then we may be able to justify why they survived or what happened. The first secret also leads to another secret of where exactly are they. All we know is that they are on an interstate and they are heading south. If we knew exactly where they were we may be able to justify whether the disaster was man made or not and how they could have survived depending on what kind of disaster occurred.
III: The secrets I chose may not be entirely significant to understanding the narrative but may definately be wanted by some people. If we knew all the answers to the secrets though, the reader would not be on the same level as the characters. It seems as if right now the characters may be just as lost as we are. We, the reader, are on the same path the characters are and we must read/walk on to find out the answers to the secrets.
BA#1: McCarthy's The Road
II: This is connected to the secret, what the disaster? In the novel, details such as “ashes” only leave you thinking fire, an element caused by many disasters. Not knowing when or what left me wondering what is behind the characters journey and where they are off to.
III: These unraveled secrets are not significant when it comes to understanding the general story, but for curious readers, they’re left wondering what the disaster is, whether it’s supernatural or war, causing such instability. PG. 17 notes the characters’ struggle, as a reader I wonder what cause motivated the author.
BA #1 McCarthy's The Road
II:This secret can be compared to another secret which the author keeps from us, the secret of why the boy, "Papa," and the wife survived. These secrets are related because if the reader understood exactly what took place, perhaps we could understand why specific people died and other survived.
III: While this secret is not a necessity to understanding the novel as a whole, it would certainly provide an entirely different level of understanding the novel. While it makes sense the author wants to provide the reader with the same level of understanding of the disaster that the characters have, it is highly unlikely that the characters, several years after the disaster, would not have known what had happened.
BA#1 Cormac McCarthy's The Road
II. This is similar to "carried away" because secrets are kept about the truth of the dead body in the factory said to be Jack Agnew. The man who finds and for some reason touches the head did not think to look if it was Jack Agnew but that he thought it was.
III. I feel that Cormac McCarthy really didn't want us to have a whole lot of clues about whats going on. He leaves a lot of open ends in the book, especially with the lack of chapters which also seems to be significant with the direction that the story is going. More information would be a big help.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
BA#1 McCarthy's The Road
2. This secret is similar to the short story Carried Away in that the author has withheld crucial information that can help the reader to understand the novel better. In Carried Away, we are unsure of who the man at the train station is in the end of the story. On page 49 we realize that Louisa isn't talking to show she thinks she is talking to. "That edge of a joke, that uneasy kindness, made her think of somebody else. Who's was it?". Knowing who he is would have led to a better understanding of the story instead of being left without answers. This relates to The Road because we are left wondering the entire novel if this is the boys father.
3. I don't think that understanding the relationship of the man and boy is absolutely necessary to understanding the narrative. I do feel that knowing would help make the novel a little bit clearer however we know that the man will do anything to protect the boy and therefore that there is some kind of bond between them.
BA # 1 McCarthy's The Road
In Carried Away, there is a secret similar to this one dealing with who is married to who. Jack Agnew continued writing letters to the librarian known as Louisa Doud. He kept his marriage to Grace Agnew a secret from Louisa. When he died, the reader was able to find out this secret. In The Road, we are still unsure of how each character is related to one another.
I think knowing how each character is related is important, because it would make the reader understand how the man and boy know each other and if the woman referred to as the wife did have the boy as a son. The talks between the man and boy are very simple and I often wonder if they are father and son. They look out for each other while traveling the Road and stay away from bad people.
BA #1 The Road
BA#1 McCarthy's The Road
This secret is a little like Carried Away in Open Secrets where we do not know exactly how the Jack Agnew died. The author tells us of a man who was killed in a factory by a machine and is beheaded. However, the man who actually touched the head of the dead man said he did not even look to see if it was truly Jack Agnew. Therefore, just like we know there was some type of destruction that happened to the land we do not know if that is what caused them to be starving, struggling, and moving toward the south.
This secret is not critical to understand the narrative; however, details about it would help answer questions the readers may have. If the reader knew when the tragedy happened they would be able to see how long the man and son have been living in this which could justify some of their actions. Also if we knew about how the tragedy formed we would be able to understand the struggle by realizing what it would be like if that happened to us.
BA #1 McCarthy's The Road
When comparing this secret to another secret in Open Secrets, it is similar in the fact that the readers are not being told something (there is a secret) but as you read further into the text, more information is being revealed about the secret. In Open Secrets we know little about the man that sends Louisa letters but then as we read on we soon find out the man was married and he was writing those letters possibly because he did not think he was going to live much longer, being in the war.
This secret is definitely significant in understanding the narrative because it is leaves the reader wanting to read more into the book. It leaves the reader with many questions. I believe once we are told this secret the whole book will come together and we will get a better understanding of what is really going on in The Road.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Welcome to the Blog for Contemporary Literature (Section 2)
You'll be using this blog to "post" (create a text entry on the front page) or "comment" (respond to another student's post). For each post, you should consider significant secrets in that week's reading assignments. Over the course of the semester, you will create at least 7 entries: at least 2 posts and at least 5 comments. (You may have more posts or comments, but you should have at least one entry per week.)
To make things clear, you'll need to number each post or comment as BA #x (according to the one due that week: so, for BA #1, you'll examine the secrets in McCarthy's The Road; for BA #3, you'll look at Harrower's Blackbird.) To create a post, click on "New Post" at the top of the blog page. To create a comment, click on "Comments" at the bottom of the blog posting to which you want to respond.
For each post, you will need to do the following, in the order given, including the numerals to designate the separate parts of the assignment. Label the post BA#x, plus the author and title of the literary text: thus, BA#1 McCarthy's The Road, then provide the following in your post:
1. Provide a short (no more than 50 words) summary or description of the secret. Be sure to indicate who holds the secret (a character, the author, or reader) and from whom the secret is kept (a character, the author, or reader). Also indicate (by quoting and citing) where in the text you realized that there was a secret being held.
2. Compare this secret to another secret, either from the same text or from a text we’ve already read in class. (Again, no more than 50 words.) This should not be a simple observation of how this secret is "just like" another: they're both about love, they are both kept from someone they love , or they both compromise a character's aspirations. Such statements are invariably trite overgeneralizations. Maybe the secrets you're comparing are of a similar nature but the different characters have different motivations for keeping them; maybe both secrets are kept for similar reasons but they have different consequences; maybe both secrets are kept from the reader but one is eventually revealed while the other one is not. Note that each of these examples presents differences within apparent or surface similarities, an approach which generally isn't a bad way to go. You MUST support your answer with evidence that you quote and cite from the text(s).
3. Argue (no more than 50 words) whether or not understanding your chosen secret is significant to the understanding the narrative.
For your comments, you should agree or disagree with a post’s conclusions about a secret's narratorial significance (part 3) by providing and explaining NEW evidence that either supports or questions the post.